How must inferior courts interpret the law?

The correct approach for inferior courts in interpreting the law is to follow the interpretations set forth by the Supreme Court. This principle stems from the concept of judicial hierarchy and the doctrine of stare decisis, which entails that lower courts must adhere to precedents established by higher courts. This ensures consistency and uniformity in the application of the law across the judicial system.

When inferior courts align their interpretations with those of the Supreme Court, they uphold the rule of law and reinforce the authority of the higher court's decisions. This adherence to higher court rulings is essential for maintaining a coherent legal framework and ensuring that similar cases are treated similarly, preserving fairness and predictability in the judicial process.

Other options do not accurately reflect the legal framework that governs how inferior courts operate. Inferior courts do not have the discretion to interpret laws independently of Supreme Court guidance, and they are not swayed by their own conjectures or the political climate. Their interpretations must remain grounded in the judicial doctrines established by the Supreme Court.